As AI Reshapes Travel Discovery, Where Will Hotel Brands Create Value?

A panel of current and former leaders from Wyndham, Aimbridge, CitizenM, and Accor debate whether AI will amplify existing hotel brands or force reinvention.At HITEC 2026, a panel of hospitality leaders convened to discuss artificial intell...

Published Jul 01, 2026
6 min read
Share:
As AI Reshapes Travel Discovery, Where Will Hotel Brands Create Value?
As AI Reshapes Travel Discovery, Where Will Hotel Brands Create Value?

A panel of current and former leaders from Wyndham, Aimbridge, CitizenM, and Accor debate whether AI will amplify existing hotel brands or force reinvention.


At HITEC 2026, a panel of hospitality leaders convened to discuss artificial intelligence and ended up debating something far more consequential: the future value of hotel brands themselves.

The discussion was moderated by Scot Campbell, Principal Advisor at Integrated Resorts Advisors. Panelists included:

  1. Lennert de Jong , CEO of Another Star (formerly CEO of CitizenM)
  2. Scott Strickland , Chief Commercial Officer, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
  3. Floor Bleeker , Consultant at In2 Consulting (formerly CTO of Accor)
  4. Keryn McNamara , CIO of Aimbridge Hospitality

All four agreed that AI will transform hospitality. Where they diverged was on what that transformation means for the industry's traditional competitive advantages — and whether AI will reinforce or erode them.

If Everyone Has the Same Tools, What Makes a Hotel Different?

The panel's most provocative argument came from Bleeker, who suggested AI could fundamentally redraw the competitive landscape.

"If everybody has access to the same revenue management or everybody has access to the same distribution platform, something else needs to happen — and it has to be the guest experience."

It's a deceptively simple point, but one that strikes at the core of how hotel companies have historically created value. For decades, brands have differentiated through scale, distribution power, loyalty programs, technology investment, and operational expertise. AI threatens to make some of those advantages widely accessible.

Bleeker drew a parallel to cloud computing, just as it democratized technology infrastructure for businesses of all sizes, AI could do the same for distribution, loyalty management, and revenue optimization in hospitality.

"The customer will win big time. The big brands will have to think differently. They have to do something else besides distribution."

That "something else," he argued, is delivering meaningfully better guest experiences — and helping hotels operate more efficiently to get there.

Guest Experience as the New Differentiator

Both Bleeker and de Jong made the case that AI could accelerate a shift already underway: as technology becomes more accessible, execution becomes the differentiator.

De Jong pointed to the industry's long-standing failure to meaningfully improve the guest experience despite decades of technology investment. Bleeker echoed this bluntly:

"Most hotel experiences are disappointing."

The argument isn't that technology matters less — it's that technology will matter so universally that it ceases to be a differentiator on its own. If every hotel can access sophisticated revenue management, AI-powered customer service, and advanced personalization, the competitive battleground becomes the quality of the experience itself.


For hotel technology leaders, this has real implications. Years of effort have gone into building digital capabilities, integrating systems, and modernizing infrastructure. In an AI-driven future, the measure of success may increasingly be how directly those investments improve what guests actually feel.

Why Loyalty May Be Harder to Disrupt Than It Appears

Not everyone on the panel agreed that AI weakens traditional industry advantages.

Strickland offered a counterargument: AI will likely become another channel through which guests interact with brands — not a replacement for brand relationships. He described a future where travelers use AI assistants that already understand their preferences, loyalty memberships, and travel habits.

"Your AI assistant is going to know you. It's going to know your loyalty program."

In that scenario, AI doesn't eliminate loyalty — it reinforces it. Instead of manually searching hotel websites, a traveler asks an AI assistant to find accommodations matching their preferences. The assistant factors in brand affiliations, loyalty status, and past behavior before making recommendations. The booking experience becomes more seamless, but not necessarily less brand-centric.

This is an important distinction. AI may change the interface. It doesn't automatically change the underlying economics of customer acquisition and retention.

A Debate Shaped by Geography

One of the panel's most nuanced threads was a geographic divide on the value of loyalty.

De Jong, who has operated across both European and U.S. markets, argued that loyalty programs carry far greater weight in America.

"Loyalty is much more valuable in the United States than it is elsewhere in the world because it's distributed so much."

He illustrated this with a story from CitizenM's early U.S. expansion. During a stay at a Marriott-affiliated Moxy property, he found himself talking with American business travelers who were genuinely excited about CitizenM's concept — until they learned it wasn't affiliated with a major loyalty program.

"Their response was basically, 'Never going to stay there.'"

American travelers have spent decades accumulating points, earning status, and building habits around major hotel programs. Disrupting those behaviors may prove far harder than AI optimists anticipate.

AI's Biggest Impact May Be Behind the Scenes

McNamara brought a different lens to the conversation entirely — operational transformation.

Rather than centering the debate on distribution or loyalty, she pointed to where AI is already delivering measurable results at Aimbridge: labor productivity and forecasting accuracy.

"We're taking great strides and steps using AI to create labor productivity tools."

For operators navigating persistent labor pressures and tight margins, these use cases may prove just as transformative as any guest-facing innovation.

McNamara also sees AI enabling a level of personalization that has long been an industry aspiration but rarely achieved at scale.

"I think AI is just going to enable a better customized experience. It's going to know that when I travel with my family, I like something completely different than when I'm traveling by myself."

The shift she describes is from predefined guest journeys to genuinely adaptive experiences, built around individuals rather than segments.

The Bigger Question for Hotel Technology Leaders

The panel never reached a consensus — and that's precisely what made the conversation valuable.

The debate wasn't really about AI. It was about competitive advantage.

Bleeker and de Jong see AI lowering barriers to sophisticated technology, distribution, and revenue management — forcing brands to reimagine what they offer and compete on execution and experience.

Strickland and McNamara see AI strengthening existing advantages, making loyalty, personalization, and operational efficiency more powerful rather than less relevant.

The reality will likely fall somewhere in between.

But the conversation surfaces a question every hotel technology leader should be sitting with right now:

If AI makes many capabilities easier to access, where will your organization create value that competitors can't easily replicate?

The answer may define the next decade of hospitality.


Frequently Asked Questions

HospitalityAxis news delivered to your inbox

Get the free newsletter that keeps hotel developers & designers ahead of the curve.

More News & Articles

Latest Story

Deloitte's New Travel Report Has a Warning for Airlines and Hotels: The Road Warriors Are Slowing Down

The travelers airlines and hotels have relied on most heavily to prop up premium revenue may be losing some of their frequent-flyer stamina.That's the takeaway from Deloitte's 2026 Travel Industry Outlook and the accompanying Corporate Traveler Survey data behind it, which point to a meaningful cooling among the road warriors who take ten or more business trips a year. According to the survey, 53% of these frequent corporate travelers said they expected to travel three or more times in a typical month in 2026, down from 63% who said the same heading into 2025. That's a ten-point drop in a single year among precisely the travelers whose habits matter most to airline and hotel bottom lines.The reason that particular statistic matters so much comes down to spending patterns. Frequent corporate travelers, like their higher-income leisure counterparts, are disproportionately likely to book premium seats, upgraded rooms and other higher-margin products. Deloitte's report warns that if this group pulls back even modestly on both trip frequency and premium spending in 2026, the travel categories that benefited most from post-pandemic upgrade behavior "may be particularly exposed."Airlines, in particular, have leaned hard into premium cabin sales over the past several years as a source of outsized margin growth, often outpacing growth in coach revenue. Deloitte's report suggests that momentum could soften or plateau in the year ahead, which would put more pressure on carriers to get sharper about targeting the right offer to the right flyer at the right moment rather than counting on broad-based upgrade demand to keep flowing in. The hotel side faces a parallel risk: midscale and upscale resorts and city hotels could see occupancy or rate erosion if higher-income and frequent business travelers become more deal-sensitive, shorten the length of their stays, or simply take fewer trips altogether.Behind the specific travel numbers sits a broader story about consumer psychology that Deloitte's researchers describe as a widening financial split among Americans. Financial pessimism, historically concentrated among lower- and middle-income households, has crept up into higher income brackets in a way that's more pronounced than in recent years. That's producing what the report calls a growing wealth bifurcation in how people plan and pay for trips, business and leisure alike. Even affluent, frequent travelers who have the means to keep booking premium options at their prior pace appear to be second-guessing whether they should.Harvey Chipkin, writing about the findings for Business Travel Executive, summarized the risk bluntly: corporate travel may be slowing down "among highly desirable road warriors," the exact segment that travel brands have spent years building loyalty programs and premium products specifically to retain. If that segment's travel cadence keeps drifting downward, the loyalty economics that airlines and hotel chains depend on to justify premium investment could come under real strain.None of this amounts to a wholesale collapse in business travel demand, and Deloitte's broader outlook doesn't read as bearish so much as cautious. Travel remains a clear spending priority for both companies and individual American travelers, according to the report. The concern Deloitte raises isn't that people will stop traveling for work altogether, but that the growth engine that has powered the post-pandemic recovery, driven substantially by high-frequency, high-spend travelers trading up to premium products, may be running out of room to keep accelerating at the same pace.That has real implications for how airlines and hotel companies plan their next year. Deloitte's report flags competition for high-spending travelers as likely to intensify even as the overall pool of easy upgrade revenue shrinks. Ultra-luxury demand appears to be holding up better than the broader premium segment, the report notes, but airlines and hotels may need to work harder and spend more on precise targeting to capture affluent travelers who have become pickier, more price-conscious, or simply willing to trade down on any given trip.The generational makeup of who's actually driving travel demand is shifting too, according to Deloitte's outlook, and that shift carries its own implications for corporate travel programs. Gen Z and Millennials are now described in the report as defining the center of U.S. travel demand overall, shaping everything from which booking channels get used to what travelers expect from sustainability practices and how they define value versus luxury. Those two generations have kept traveling at a relatively steady clip even during periods of softer demand elsewhere, the report notes, which Deloitte suggests will increasingly influence how travel brands design products and market to travelers going forward, corporate travelers very much included as younger employees move into roles that require more business travel.Artificial intelligence is the other undercurrent running through Deloitte's 2026 outlook, and it intersects directly with how corporate travel gets booked and managed. The report describes this as a moment when generative AI tools are starting to reshape how travelers discover and purchase trips, even though fully integrated AI-powered booking experiences are still more emerging than mainstream. Deloitte frames 2026 as a potential turning point for how personalization and merchandising work in travel, a dynamic that overlaps closely with what corporate travel platforms and managed travel programs are simultaneously trying to build into their own booking tools.For corporate travel managers and the suppliers who serve them, Deloitte's report functions less as a warning of imminent disaster and more as an early signal to watch closely. A ten-point drop in the share of frequent travelers planning to hit the road three-plus times a month is not, by itself, a crisis. But it's exactly the kind of leading indicator that tends to show up in loyalty program engagement and premium cabin load factors before it shows up in headline revenue numbers. If the caution Deloitte is describing among affluent and frequent travelers persists through the rest of 2026, airlines and hotel companies that built recent growth strategies around premium upsells may need to recalibrate faster than they'd planned, precisely at a moment when GBTA's own buyer surveys suggest overall corporate travel budgets are still expected to hold steady or grow. The two data sets aren't necessarily in conflict, but they do describe an industry where the money keeps flowing while the travelers who spend it most aggressively are starting to hesitate.

Jul 03, 2026